WAM has an attractive design (Two columns, Two colors, Two fonts 
and Two languages...) WAM has also a well structurated format 
(Graffitti, Homeless, Witness, Lodging, Emergencies, etc.) 

If WAM was a paper-based-printed review it would be a nice 
magazine. 

But I imagine a web page (I have see some) as a more powerfull tool 
than any printed material since now. 

A web page is something fool. Full of links. Easy links. Every link on 
every place. Not a "Tractatus", nor a definitive "explanation", nor a 
finished "discours", not LITERATURE (except the hypertext literary 
experiment). 

Perhaps only "communication" (what can we loose?) 

If one of the goals of WAM is to become a printed magazine, perhaps 
this organization is good. 

But if WAM pretend to be a rich architectural or discussion site in 
the NET, perhaps she must to point at most powerfull features. 

I suggest:

some more links, and commented if possible.(basic) some more 
graphics, photos, drawings, scans, 3d documents ("WAM" is for 
"A"rchitecture). some more technical information (building, urban, 
computer, etc.) 

I don't need a beautiful magazine. But I will appreciate any 
communication efford.